According to Reuters, the state of Louisiana was ordered
on Monday to delay for 90 days the execution of a convicted killer that had
been planned with a mix of the same two drugs that left a condemned Ohio inmate
gasping and convulsing as he was put to death.
Christopher Sepulvado had been scheduled to die on
Wednesday at a Louisiana prison using a combination of the sedative midazolam
and pain killer hydromorphone if the regularly listed drug pentobarbital was
unavailable.
U.S. District Court Judge James Brady ordered the
execution delayed at least until May 4 and set a trial to begin April 7 on a
defense challenge to the constitutionality of the state's execution methods.
"The stay will allow additional time for review and
responses to outstanding issues related to the execution," Louisiana's
corrections department said in a statement.
Lawyers for Sepulvado had argued they could not prepare
an adequate appeal if Louisiana did not disclose what drugs it planned to use
for the execution or determine whether he would face pain and suffering in
violation of the U.S. Constitution's protection against cruel and unusual
punishment.
Sepulvado was convicted in 1993 of killing his 6-year-old
stepson and sentenced to death.
Louisiana and other states have been increasingly forced
to look for alternate sources of execution drugs as pharmaceutical companies
raise objections to their products being used for capital punishment.
Oh
poor Sepulvado!
He
is now objecting to being executed in a manner that constitutes a "cruel
and unusual punishment". But what about the 6-year-old boy he killed in
1993 and for which he was convicted...was he kind enough to kill that poor boy
in a "nice" manner?
Give
me a break!
No comments:
Post a Comment